Posts Tagged ‘healthcare’

SM on jail time for the uninsured: “I can’t say that that’s not possible”

Friday, November 27th, 2009

Congressman Murphy recently sat down with Post Star reporter Maury Thompson.Their exchange wasn’t anything to write home about, with the exception of the Congressman’s response about throwing people in jail for failing to buy health insurance. Read the interview for yourself; the statement of concern is:

“I am not an expert on jail time for not getting health insurance. I would be surprised if that was that (sic) the way it was intended to work. But I can’t say that that’s not possible.”

The response that most of us would have preferred was:

That’s the sort of idea that would be put forth by my unhinged colleagues who represent constituencies that are almost entirely dependent on Medicaid because they survive at levels of destitution that their representatives really don’t have any serious interests in alleviating. As a result, these crazies of the Charlie Rangel variety are free to focus their energies on penalizing those individuals who have the audacity to work their way out of such poverty and escape this dependence on handouts.

Or, more succinctly:

I will not vote to jail, or, for that matter, fine anyone who does not purchase health insurance.

As someone who has reaped not insignificant benefits from being able to make his own decisions with his own money and his own life, Congressman Murphy, of all people, should understand the folly of levying a mandate of this sort.

The Public Option for Cable Television

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

SM votes against HR3962—but he still likes the idea

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

It looks like Congressman Murphy read the tea leaves before Saturday’s vote to inject more government into healthcare, and by “read the tea leaves” I mean “saw the amalgamation of public outrage and lack of support outside of the liberal fringe and subsequently freaked”. If he had any aspirations of getting re-elected in one of the most conservative districts in the Northeast, casting a “yes” vote would have rapidly transitioned those aspirations into delusions.

Unfortunately, Congressman Murphy is still advocating the idea. From his post-HR 3962 press release:

This bill makes a number of important reforms, which I wholeheartedly support including the elimination of the lifetime caps on insurance benefits and the pre-existing condition exclusion, invests in prevention and primary care, creates a health insurance exchange to force insurance companies to compete and offers a public option for people who want to get away from for-profit insurance companies.

For those who don’t speak Beltway with the same proficiency as the Congressman’s taxpayer-funded communications director, I’ll offer a translation:

I might not have had the guts to vote for it, but I still like the idea of having the government work to put our private insurers out of business so we can sign you up for government-administered healthcare. I’m willing to ignore the fact that the feds have dropped the ball on administering the VA, maintaining the integrity of Medicaid and keeping Medicare in the black, because if I want to get re-elected, I need to keep pandering to the unmedicated lunatics from MoveOn and Citizens Action who blindly supported me because I had a “D” after my name.

This was definitely a “for-it-before-he-was-against-it” moment, and the kicker was that Murphy attributes his opposition to the program’s cost being too great. Congressman Murphy, it can therefore be construed, wants to do away with public insurers, but he wants to do it on the cheap. For those of you watching at home: that does not make him a fiscal conservative.

SM votes to spend taxdollars on abortions

Saturday, November 7th, 2009

Earlier this evening, the House voted to approve the Stupak Amendment, a measure that prevents federal taxdollars from being used to subsidize abortions as part of the Obama healthcare plan. Congressman Murphy voted NO to the measure.

The issue at hand wasn’t the ethics or morality of abortion itself; it was whether our taxdollars should be spent on something that tens if not hundreds of millions of American believe constitutes the taking of a human life.

On eve of the healthcare showdown, SM silent on broken Pelosi pledge

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Nancy Pelosi has broken her promise to post legislation online 72 hours prior to votes to allow thorough scrutiny by the public, stuffing in additional content less than a day before the House is to vote on the trillion dollar monsterosity; Congressman Murphy has been silent on both whether he’ll be able to read Pelosi’s latest contribution before tomorrow’s vote and whether he condones reneging on such a crucial pledge.

Liberal blogs like Media Matters insist that it’s perfectly acceptable to sneak in additional content at the last minute, even after repeated pledges that 72 hours would be given to scrutinize bills. Of course, this is coming from the same cabal that plunged America into a protracted re-evaluation of the classification of fellatio and the definition of “is”, so we’re not sure they should be taking the lead on this one.